Russia’s Nuclear Behavior: Doctrine vs. Reality
A discussion with Stephen Blank and Mark Schneider on Russian nuclear strategy, coercion and the relationship between stated doctrine and behavior.
Stephen Blank · Independent expert
Research, briefings, speaking and expert testimony grounded in decades of scholarship and policy experience.
I help organizations, policymakers and legal teams examine Russian foreign and defense policy—and understand its implications for the questions they face.

U.S. Army War CollegeProfessor of Research, 1989–2013
Foreign Policy Research InstituteNon-Resident Senior Fellow, Eurasia Program
University of ChicagoMA and PhD in Russian History
Ways to work together
From a focused question to an ongoing analytical relationship, each engagement begins with your needs, audience and timeframe.
Focused analysis of Russian foreign policy, security and strategic developments, with time for questions and discussion.
A private briefing helps your team place a development in context, examine competing interpretations and identify implications for its work. Content is tailored to the audience and the question you need to explore.
Written analysis addressing a defined policy question, region or defense issue, at the depth your assignment requires.
I develop analytical papers and reports for organizations seeking a substantive assessment of Russian policy and its international consequences. We agree the research question, intended use, length and delivery schedule before work begins.
Continuing analytical support for clients who need an informed perspective beyond a single report or conversation.
A recurring engagement creates a clear rhythm for commissioned analysis, articles or briefings. Together we define the subjects to follow, the outputs you need and an editorial or review process that works for both sides.
Substantive talks and discussions for conferences, policy forums, professional associations and private events.
I bring historical perspective and contemporary analysis to discussions of Russia’s role in international security. A presentation can be developed for a specialist audience or for participants who need a clear introduction to a complex subject.
Independent expert analysis and testimony in legal proceedings where Russian policy and country conditions are relevant.
I consider expert-witness assignments within my areas of expertise, including matters involving Russian state institutions and conditions relevant to immigration proceedings. Initial discussions establish the issues, relevant experience, schedule and scope.
Availability and fees are agreed directly. Please begin with a non-confidential outline.
Discuss an expert-witness inquiry →Expert input for hearings and staff briefings on Russia, its international relationships and security policy.
My experience includes testimony before Congress on Russia, China and Central Asia. I welcome inquiries from committees, commissions and staff seeking a substantive assessment of a Russia-related policy question.
Select a service to explore the scope. Remote engagements are welcome; in-person arrangements depend on the assignment and availability.
A continuing perspective
Some questions need more than a single answer. A recurring relationship provides space to follow developments, revisit assumptions and build a fuller understanding over time.
For a research team, that might mean a regular analytical paper and discussion. For a publication, it might mean a defined series of commissioned articles. The scope and cadence are developed around a concrete need.
Discuss a recurring engagement →About Stephen
Historical depth.
Close attention to policy.
Clear, direct analysis.
Dr. Stephen Blank is a historian and specialist in Russian foreign and defense policy, with a career spanning professional military education, policy research and independent consulting.
From 1989 to 2013, he served as a Professor of Research in Russian, CIS and Eastern European Studies at the Strategic Studies Institute of the U.S. Army War College. Earlier, he taught Soviet studies at Air University. His subsequent work has included roles with the American Foreign Policy Council and the U.S. Institute of Peace.
He is a Non-Resident Senior Fellow in the Foreign Policy Research Institute’s Eurasia Program. His extensive publications examine Russian strategy, military affairs and international relationships across Europe, Asia and other regions. He has testified before Congress, contributed to international conferences and provided analysis for media audiences.
Stephen holds an MA and PhD in Russian History from the University of Chicago and speaks Russian and French. Based in the Washington, DC area, he is available for selected consulting, writing, speaking and testimony engagements.
Selected work
Research, testimony and recorded discussions illustrating my work across policy questions and audiences. Each selection links to its original publisher.
A discussion with Stephen Blank and Mark Schneider on Russian nuclear strategy, coercion and the relationship between stated doctrine and behavior.
An expert briefing on Russian strategy and nuclear policy, followed by audience questions. The recording uses a static visual with an audio waveform.
A report placing the war in Ukraine within a wider European security context.
Read the report ↗An examination of Russian nuclear policy and its relationship to the war in Ukraine.
Read the report ↗A study of the interaction between regional and foreign actors in a contested maritime environment.
Read the paper (PDF) ↗Testimony for the U.S.–China Economic and Security Review Commission’s hearing on the implications of China–Russia relations for the United States.
View hearing and testimony ↗An examination of how naval access, security relationships and economic interests fit into Russia’s Africa strategy.
Read the analysis ↗Explore additional reports, commentary and research through Stephen’s institutional author profile.
Explore the archive ↗Showing 8 selections
These earlier conversations provide a record of analysis at the time of publication. They are presented in their historical context.
A conversation about Russian intentions and European security, recorded before the February 2022 full-scale invasion of Ukraine.
An in-person presentation at a National Security Group Lunch on Capitol Hill, recorded October 31, 2014.
An example of a small-group event focused on U.S.–Russia relations.
More published work: New Lines Institute ↗ · TRENDS Research & Advisory ↗
Speaking & briefings
A useful talk starts with the audience. Whether the setting is a professional conference, an institutional briefing or a small-group discussion, the subject and depth should serve the questions in the room.
These topic areas can provide a starting point for an agreed presentation. Format, preparation, fees and availability are discussed for each engagement.
How Moscow connects foreign policy, military power and relationships abroad—and what that means for other governments and organizations.
Military cooperation, strategic alignment and the questions their relationship raises for regional and international security.
Russian activity in Africa and Asia, including power projection, regional partnerships and the implications for external actors.
Russian military thinking, nuclear policy and the implications of unmanned systems across air, land and sea.
Working together
Good work begins with a shared understanding of the question, the deliverable and the time available.
Tell me what you need to understand, who the work is for and when you need it. We establish whether the assignment fits my expertise and availability.
We clarify the format, preparation, delivery date, review process and fee. Public-facing and confidential work are scoped according to their intended use.
Where a continuing need exists, we can discuss a further assignment or a recurring arrangement with a defined focus and realistic cadence.
Start a conversation
For consulting, commissioned research, speaking or testimony inquiries, please share the subject, intended audience or use, and your timeframe.
A short, non-confidential outline is enough to begin. The next step is a discussion of fit, scope and availability.
traininblank@aol.comWashington, DC area · Remote engagements welcome